Did the Da Vinci Code inspire any Christians rethink who Christ may have been?

It didn't make me think anything, except that Dan Brown is certainly a fraud. This book is entirely fiuction and plagiarized from earl;ier books that are nonsense too. Dan Brown was sued for that. There's no proof whatsoever for any of the radical ideas given in the stories that Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene and had children by her who were ancestors of French kings iof the Merovingian dynasty. Pierre Plantard invented this "balle" in the 1950s and planted fake charts in the national; library that he pretended to discover later. He claimed that Leonardo da Vinci and later Sir iIaac Newton were once in sharge of the Priory of Sion that keeps the secret of Jesus' marriage. Plantard invented this group in the 1950s. Frauds say Mary is in Leonardo's painting of "The Last Supper", but it's really John at his right. John was portrayed as a young, delicate and androgynous figure by most artists of the period as a little research will show anyone. The book shoukld be titled "The Leonarddo Code", not "The DaVinci Code", so Dan Brown doesn't even know how to properly designate the artist. leonardo was born in Vince, and I was born in Roma. Do you call me da Roma, instead of Venus? Dan Brown made millions from his fraudulent book. i say he should be in prison for swindling.